Immanuel Kant (1724-1804)
- Kant was one of the most influential philosophers of
Europe, and is widely considered to be the last major thinker of the
Enlightenment. He had a major impact on Romantic and Idealistic
philosophies of the 19th century.
 |
Immanuel Kant |
- In
his own life, Kant was known to be an eccentric who worked almost all
of the time.Heinrich Heine wrote that “The life story of Immanuel Kant
is hard to describe, because he had neither a life nor a story.”
- He
was known to wear the same clothes every day, and kept such regular
time that it was rumored that the housewives of his town set their
clocks by his daily walks.
- He was also a strong influence for Hegel.
- Kant is primarily known for transcendental idealism-that
we bring innate forms and concepts to the raw experience of the world,
which would otherwise be unknowable. We perceive the world by means of
our senses, and therefore the thing-in-itself cannot be known.
Deontology Versus Consequentialism. Oh, and Aretaism
- Deontology is the view that morality either forbids or permits action.
- Consequentialism
holds that the rightness or wrongness of an act depends on the
consequences of the act, and therefore the circumstances under which it
is performed.
- John Rawls explains that the difference between the two is understood when you consider that what actions are right and what things are good are at least partially independent.
- Under
deontology, individuals are bound by constraints (such as the
requirement not to lie), but are also given options (such as the right
not to give to charity). Strict consequentialism recognizes neither—one
must maximize the good by any and all means necessary.
- Aretaic
theories often maintain that character, as opposed to actions or their
consequences, should be the focal point of ethical theory.
Categorical Imperative
- In Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals, Kant explained the Categorical Imperative in Three Ways:
- Act only in accordance with that maxim by which you can at the same time will that it should become universal law;
- Act
in such a way that you always treat humanity, whether in your own
person or in the person of any other, never simply as a means, but
always at the same time as an end;
- All maxims as proceeding from our own making of the law ought to harmonize with a possible kingdom of ends.
- Essentially, the categorical imperative argues for the centrality of fairness and universality.
Each person must realize that there must be a consistent law for
everyone—there cannot be one rule for me and another for others.
-
For example, stealing cannot be justified. If you steal, you deny the
existence of property rights for others. In effect, you are denying
morally your own right to ownership—and thus, the whole act would be
self-defeating.
Problems
- Benjamin Constant—the example of the murderer. He argued
that Kant's theory would require a person to tell the truth about the
location to a murder of his prey.
- Kant argued that one cannot know the consequences
of his/her actions—for example, what if you lied to the murderer,
saying the victim was in the park, and unbeknownst to you, the victim
had gone there. Honest, he really did say that!
- He also argued that the truth-teller would not be morally responsible for the murder, but would be for the lie.
- Difficulty in establishing the difference between what is
a moral requirement (maxim) and what is merely a good idea(prudential).
- Sir
David Ross argued that a world in which everyone could be depended upon
to always break their promises would be just as effective and reliable
as a world in which everyone kept their promises.